|
Paparazzi Images have been around for years, and whilst
on some occasions the celebrity seems okay with having a camera shoved in
their face, in many situations they are clearly uncomfortable. And yet,
Celebrity fansites continue to show images of their chosen celeb clearly
distressed or trying to avoid the paps. The question is, just because you
are famous does that mean you have no rights to privacy? My personal
opinion is that we should respect the celebrities and if we are truly fans
then we would realise that many of these celebs find it intrusive and have
to go to great lengths to avoid the paparazzi.
Fansites the world over are full of pap pics, and that is great for those
that appreciate them, but I have noticed a growing trend for sites who are
staying clear of these often tacky and intrusive pictures. Ask yourself,
as a fan, do you really need to see Britney Spears crying in a restaurant
clearly in distress at what was possibly the hardest time in her life?
Please guys think more about where these images come from and the way in
which your favourite celebrity may be being hounded by the paps to get
that elusive shot.
If like me, you think it's time the celebs got a chance to get back some
of their privacy then you can display the button below on your site.
Please do note that we are not talking about events pictures, photoshoots,
movie filming etc.. We are talking solely about when your Celeb is going
for dinner with friends/family, enjoying a relaxing holiday, going to the
shops or worst still, when they are clearly in a huge amount of distress. That's what we like to call stalkerazzi - how would you like it ??
|
Stalkerazzi - Courtesy of Wikipedia
Stalkerazzi is a portmanteau of stalker and "paparazzi" and as
the name implies signifies those whose techniques tend toward invading
personal space and privacy. The term has gained usage in reference to
popular culture figures like celebrities and people made famous
through media and news events.
|
|